Why should people allow marrying only after age 30

Why should people allow marrying only after age 30 Introduction One of the mainly sure ways to progress the physical condition and well-being of the world’s inhabitants is to hearten and shore up the thought of marriage.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Why should people allow marrying only after age 30? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The continued researches divulges that, the married people are normally bodily healthier, more contented, survives longer, enjoys enhanced mental health, are more satisfied and less expected to suffer corporeal abuse. Premarital cohabitation does not convey the equal advantage nuptials do. As a substitute, it conveys amplified variance and hostility as well as amplified probability of break up in later marriages. Dr. Robert H. Coombs, one of the researchers, showed that, â€Å"married people live longer and generally are more emotionally and physically healthy than the unmarried. If this is the case, why should there be a fixed age of marriage and yet marriage brings total happiness, good healthy, mental health and extended life span in human being? According to Dr. Robert H. Coombs research, he totally disagrees that people should be allowed to marry only after the age of 30. To start with, he quotes a verse in the bible that says, â€Å"It’s better to marry than to burn up†. According to the verse, he noted that, this verse was not there for the people over thirty years but for the people who could not resist sexual behaviors. Nowadays, the high rates of sexual transmitted diseases are highly spread by the youths who are have not attained the age of thirty and not married. If age is put aside, and every one who cannot withdraw his/her sexual temperature by the help of the people is allowed to marry, this would reduce the rate of sexual transmitted diseases. Another reason as to why I disagree on marriage after the age of 30 is that, many psychological related problems are experienced by th e people who are not married. If any one who feels ready to marry regardless the age is given the access, then the rate of deaths relating to psychological problems will be reduced. Dr. Robert H. Coombs, in his research, commended that, if age was not the key factor to marriage, then the high rate of deaths caused by; alcoholism, suicides, loneliness, Psychiatric problems, and Morbidity and mortality would be highly reduced. He also said, if anybody who felt like marrying regardless the age was genuinely given the opportunity and backed by the other members, then this would lead to happiness hence kicking out the high chances of psychological related problems.Advertising Looking for essay on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Finally, the reason as to why I disagree on marriage after the age of 30 is that, it brings about use of drugs. As a result of the latest science and technology, people are getting a lot of money while still young and not married thus indulging to some drug behaviors like the use of cocaine’s, alcohol among others. If the freedom of marriage regardless the age is unrestricted and people marrying, the time of using all these drugs will not be got because of the many responsibilities of a family thus bringing about raising a good generation without contractions. Conclusion One of the mainly sure ways to progress the physical condition and well-being of the world’s inhabitants is to hearten and shore up the thought of marriage. Marriage brings about happiness, enhanced mental health, and long life span among others. If this is the case, I disagree with the statement that says that, people should be allowed to marry only after the age of 30. The essay puts across that, marrying after 30 years; there would be likely cases like psychological related problems, use of drugs and high sexual behaviors. Giving access to every one who feels like marrying an d supported by the other people would lead to the global expansion.

Thylacoleo (Marsupial Lion) - Facts and Figures

Thylacoleo (Marsupial Lion) - Facts and Figures Name: Thylacoleo (Greek for marsupial lion); pronounced THIGH-lah-co-LEE-oh Habitat: Plains of Australia Historical Epoch: Pleistocene-Modern (2 million-40,000 years ago) Size and Weight: About five feet long and 200 pounds Diet: Meat Distinguishing Characteristics: Leopard-like body; powerful jaws with sharp teeth About Thylacoleo (the Marsupial Lion) Its a commonly held misconception that that the giant wombats, kangaroos and koala bears of Pleistocene Australia were only able to prosper thanks to the lack of any natural predators. However, a quick glance at Thylacoleo (also known as the Marsupial Lion) puts the lie to this myth; this nimble, large-fanged, heavily built carnivore was every bit as dangerous as a modern lion or leopard, and pound-for-pound it possessed the most powerful bite of any animal in its weigh classwhether bird, dinosaur, crocodile or mammal. (By the way, Thylacoleo occupied a different evolutionary branch from saber-toothed cats, exemplified by the North American Smilodon.) See a slideshow of 10 Recently Extinct Lions and Tigers As the largest mammalian predator in an Australian landscape teeming with oversized, plant-eating marsupials, the 200-pound Marsupial Lion must have lived high on the hog (if youll forgive the mixed metaphor). Some paleontologists believe that Thylacoleos unique anatomyincluding its long, retractable claws, semi-opposable thumbs and heavily muscled forelimbsenabled it to pounce on its victims, quickly disembowel them, and then drag their bloody carcasses high up into the branches of trees, where it could feast at its leisure unmolested by smaller, peskier scavengers. One odd feature of Thylacoleo, albeit one that makes perfect sense given its Australian habitat, was its unusually powerful tail, as evidenced by the shape and arrangement of its caudal vertebrae (and, presumably, the muscles attached to them). The ancestral kangaroos that coexisted with the Marsupial Lion also possessed strong tails, which they could use to balance themselves on their hind feet while warding off predatorsso its not inconceivable that Thylacoleo could tussle for short periods on its two hind feet, like an oversized tabby cat, especially if a tasty dinner was at stake. As intimidating as it was, Thylacoleo may not have been the apex predator of Pleistocene Australiasome paleontologists claim that honor belongs to Megalania, the Giant Monitor Lizard, or even the plus-sized crocodile Quinkana, both of which may have occasionally hunted (or been hunted by) the Marsupial Lion. In any case, Thylacoleo exited the history books about 40,000 years ago, when the earliest human settlers of Australia hunted its gentle, unsuspecting, herbivorous prey to extinction, and even sometimes targeted this powerful predator directly when they were especially hungry or aggravated (a scenario attested to by recently discovered cave paintings).